2023 Consulting Tier List
Is there anything I need to say?
Tier 2: EY- Parthenon , Strategy&, Oliver Wyman , LEK, Kearney, Altman Solon, OC&C
I know you people from Deloitte and Accenture would want to say that you guys belong here but all you guys do is implementation bullshit so I'm gonna drop you down half a tier. Other than that, I think in terms of pay, growth and projects, each firm that I put in T2 deserves their spot. EYP and LEK kill the PE DD space and have strong corporate strategy verticals, Strategy& is solid overall with a strong deals practice, Kearney is great at operational work, OW is huge and has a standout financial services practice, Altman has been absolutely dominating the TMT space. OC&C is the one people have probably heard of less but despite its boutique size, its intellectual talent and pickiness for top tier strategy projects puts it up here with the other T2s.
Tier 2.5: Deloitte Strategy, Accenture Strategy, ZS, Roland Berger, Simon Kucher, A&M CPI , Clearview
Alright Deloitte and Accenture, let's talk. There's a reason why Deloitte had to retitle its Monitor division to Deloitte Strategy & Operations and now, Deloitte Strategy (& Analytics) - all for the implementation bs work that's dominating your company because Deloitte knows that's where they can make the most money. Accenture - I will say that you get sexy tech companies as your projects, but so many projects lean towards less real "strategy" work that you'd get at a better firm. ZS and Clearview kill it in healthcare/life sciences so I'll put them here for people that really want to do LS/HC - these are genuinely good firms to be at. Roland Burger, Simon Kucher and A&M's CPI (not restructuring) would also sit here as well.
Tier 3: PwC Management Consulting , EY Business Consulting, Accenture CDP/TDP, Putnam, Kaiser, Keystone, Mars, Charles River , Booz Allen Hamilton
From all these firms, I'd argue that PwC Management Consulting might be the strongest - there's enough differentiation from the work they do here compared to Strategy& , while EY Business Consulting is easily overshadowed by EY-Parthenon because of the similarity of certain projects. Accenture CDP is another strong choice here, where similar to Accenture Strategy, its "management consulting" is really a lot of implementation/IT, but CDP does have the opportunity to network up into Accenture Strategy, while TDP can do CDP projects. Putnam is a strong player in life sciences consulting, but their pay is ass. For you boutique lovers, Mars might be the best one here, with Keystone, Kaiser and Charles River being good choices as well. BAH hasn't really moved pay up a lot, and a lot of their work stays within government and public sector.
Tier 4: KPMG Strategy/Advisory, FTI, IQVIA
Alright, so KPMG being the worst of the big 4 shouldn't come off as a surprise. I mean, if it's the best offer you have, it's great, but there's a reason why almost anyone can get an offer at KPMG, and why people tend to renege on it if they get anything better, especially during full-time recruiting. Also, KPMG doesn't case during their interviews either, for people that don't really want to practice casing. FTI has a strong RX practice, but for general consulting, it's alright. IQVIA is strong for its brand name within life sciences work, and it's very data driven as well.
Tier 5: Mercer, Protiviti, Guidehouse, Capgemini , Capco , Huron
Alright guys, now that we're at tier 5, most these firms are only here because their pay sucks, their brand sucks, their projects barely charge a fee, their talent isn't really from the best schools either, but I want to give a shout out to Mercer for still being below $70K base in this market.
Of course, there's firms I didn't include in here that are very strong in other areas of consulting, like Cornerstone and Analysis Group within econ consulting, and Alix Partners and A&M for RX , and Deloitte's other non-Strategy practices aren't real consulting, but overall I think that this is a strong overall list for the current consulting economy today. Within each tier, the big difference that separates your decision should honestly be the kind of the work that you're interested in doing the most, the kinds of exits you can achieve (e.g. industry) and the people/culture you met during the whole recruiting process.
Comments ( 9 )
Why is KPMG on the list
😆
better said, beside tier 1, why do we have all of the rest on the list?
Chill out with the elitism Prospect
After each tier, I was about the address my concerns but OP already anticipated every possible critique. He left me speechless.
10/10 job, no comments
Slalom, IBM, Point B?
Great list overall.
I would say OW, EYP, S&, LEK, and Kearney are the mainstays in T2 due to project quality and breadth. Altman Solon is pretty niche (even within TMT , the majority of their work is in telecom), I think of them in the same ballpark as ZS and Clearview as specialists that kill it in their niche. OC&C has a strong foothold in Europe but I don't think I've come across them at all in the US.
Curious where you'd put AlixPartner's PI group. I view it as pretty comparable to A&M CPI.
Decent list, but for people less familiar with consulting you need to provide the important context implicit within your selection of firms & practices, and explicitly referenced on occasion: That your list considers only a select subset of consulting work, i.e. "strategy" type stuff that MBB have historically been known for, plus some operations/supply chain/transformation. Furthermore, the former is weighted heavily over the latter. Finally, while you have disaggregated specific practices within some firms, the list aggregates industries, verticals, and geographies to produce an "overall" score - which is perfectly sensible, but it needs to remain clear that there are a whole slew of instances in which the tiering falls apart. Like if you wanted to do automotive work in Germany, in which case Roland Berger is tier 1 and quite possibly even above Bain. Or if you wanted to do only pricing work, where Simon Kucher is extremely strong.
Really a more precise view would be a table of tiers vs practice araes, and an even more comprehensive one would be a (cube?) of tiers vs practice areas vs geographies.
Modi fugiat voluptatem nam sint ipsam. Dolor cupiditate facilis unde et. Repudiandae qui qui libero maxime beatae quia tempore. Itaque temporibus magnam quaerat et tempore atque. Rem consequatur rem facilis porro voluptas similique ut. Officiis aut voluptas omnis voluptatum.
Exercitationem qui voluptate dolore quis. Consequatur voluptatem aspernatur maiores consequatur ducimus eos omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...